On August 31, two Filipino crewmen aboard a supertanker called the Sidr died in the Persian Gulf — the first merchant sailors killed since this war restarted back in July. You didn't see it on the evening news. Most people didn't see it at all. That's exactly the problem.

This war has a name most Americans have already forgotten: Iran, round two. It started on July 7, when the ceasefire that ended round one — the one Washington and Tehran signed in April, extended in June, and quietly stopped observing sometime this summer — finally collapsed for good. On September 1, U.S. forces struck roughly 100 Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps targets in a single night. Iran answered on September 2 with its largest attack since the original ceasefire — more than 59 missiles and drones. On September 3, Iran came back for a second night, hitting military bases in Kuwait and the UAE.

I want you to think about what that means. This isn't a border skirmish. It's the largest sustained U.S.-Iran exchange in over a decade, and it's happening fourteen months before an election most of Washington would prefer you didn't notice it during.

Here's the number that tells you Washington already knows how serious this is: Brent crude is trading near $95.25 a barrel — a five-week high, and roughly $29 above where it sat before the shooting started in July. WTI is at $92.09. Gasoline has crossed $4.12 a gallon nationally, versus under $3 before the war. Traffic through the Strait of Hormuz — the channel that carries roughly a fifth of the world's oil — has fallen to 43% of pre-war volumes. Eighty-four vessels have been rerouted since mid-July. Insurance underwriters are pricing this war whether or not the nightly news is covering it.

Keep in mind: the last time Brent traded above $95, it was March, at the peak of round one. Round two is already retracing the same ground — faster.

President Trump has said he's "prepared to do another one any time we want," while insisting the campaign "won't last long." Israel's defense minister has threatened to "return Iran to the Stone Age" if Tehran strikes again. And reporting out of the White House says aides are actively working to keep this war quiet until November 3 — the date of the U.S. midterms. In other words, the people running this conflict have already told you how they expect it to go: longer than they're saying, and closer to home than you'd like.

Most investors are still trading as if this is a contained regional dispute, priced in months ago and safely behind us. It isn't. Iran's own economy is the clearest evidence of that: the rial has collapsed to roughly 2.2 million to the dollar, and inflation is running near 89%. A government under that kind of pressure does not de-escalate on schedule. It escalates when it has nothing left to lose.

Gold is telling you the same story oil is. Spot gold is trading near $4,491 an ounce — up more than 26% in the past year, and over 10% in the past month alone. As Buffett has said for six decades, be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful. Right now, the smart money isn't waiting around to find out which one this is. It's buying insurance.

If you don't already own gold, or you don't already own energy exposure, I urge you to reconsider both — not because I think this war ends badly, but because I have no way to know how it ends, and neither does anyone currently making decisions about it. Plan accordingly.

And one more thing: watch gasoline prices into the fall. A war that Washington wants kept quiet and a gas price that keeps climbing are on a collision course with an election. Something will have to give.

If you're a paid-up subscriber, you already know how this playbook works: the market moves first, the headlines catch up weeks later, and by the time "Iran" is trending again, the trade you wanted to make already got more expensive. This is not a drill.

Take a look at this…

It's a radical "light-speed" device that's turning AI as we know it into "Accelerated AI", making it 100 times faster and 100 times more energy efficient.

In fact, Jensen Huang, Nvidia's founder and CEO, says this device is shattering the limitations of AI and without it, AI can't scale.

If you want to discover what this technology is, why Nvidia is betting billions on it…

And the one stock we believe could be the biggest winner when "Accelerated AI" goes mainstream…

Click here to see all the details.

On June 30, Beijing added MP Materials and USA Rare Earth to its own export control list. If those names sound familiar, they should — they're the two companies America is counting on to build a rare earth supply chain that doesn't run through China. Beijing just told them, in writing, that it noticed.

Here's what's actually going on, in three layers.

First, the criminalization. In May, Chinese authorities detained two Japanese nationals in Dalian on suspicion of smuggling rare-earth-related goods. In June, the chairman of a major Chinese precision optics company was placed under compulsory measures by Shanghai customs — his alleged crime was mislabeling germanium-laced lenses as ordinary optical glass to dodge export controls. China's Ministry of Commerce then rolled out a public tip line in July for reporting mineral export violations. This isn't paperwork anymore. It's a criminal enforcement regime.

Second, the blacklist. Beijing controls roughly 90% of global rare earth processing, 80% of tungsten, and 60% of antimony — and it just added silver to the list of materials it's willing to restrict. European licensing approvals for these materials have fallen below 25% in some sectors this year. More than 80% of European manufacturers depend on Chinese supply chains for the inputs behind their defense systems, their electric vehicles, and their power grids.

Third, the price. Materials swept up in these restrictions have spiked as much as sixfold outside China this year. That's not scarcity — Beijing's own restrictions are designed to be temporary and reversible. It's leverage. China isn't trying to create a shortage. It's making sure everyone remembers who controls the tap.

The European Union has responded with a €350 billion-plus Critical Raw Materials strategy. Most people will read that number and assume the problem is solved. It isn't — rebuilding a rare earth supply chain from nothing takes 20 to 30 years, and the window to act before this vulnerability becomes permanent is closing fast — 12 to 18 months, by most estimates.

In other words: the money is finally showing up, decades too late to matter for this cycle. If you own miners or processors positioned to compete outside China's supply chain, you're holding the scarce asset in a market Beijing just spent three months proving it can still weaponize. The leverage isn't going away.

On August 12, the Treasury Department published a number so large most newsrooms ran it as a single paragraph on page nine: the United States has borrowed $1.8 trillion in the first ten months of fiscal year 2026. That's already more than the government borrowed in all of fiscal year 2025 — with two months still left on the clock.

July alone accounted for $432 billion of that — roughly $14 billion a day, every single day, for a month with no holidays and no recess. At the current pace, full-year borrowing is on track to clear $2 trillion. Gross national debt is closing in on $40 trillion. And interest payments on that debt — not the principal, just the interest — are now running at a trillion dollars a year.

Think about that for a second. The federal government now spends more servicing debt than most cabinet departments spend on their entire mission. And the same reports flagging these numbers are also flagging something worse: the trust funds behind Social Security and Medicare are heading toward insolvency on a timeline that overlaps with all of this.

Most people hear "$1.8 trillion" and their eyes glaze over — it's an abstraction, a number too big to feel real. Here's the plain-English version: the government is borrowing $14 billion a day to keep the lights on, and the interest bill alone now rivals the entire discretionary budget of most federal agencies combined.

This is why gold is sitting at a record $4,491 an ounce. It's not a coincidence that the metal with no counterparty risk is hitting all-time highs in the same month the Treasury confirmed it's borrowing at a pace that would have been unthinkable a decade ago. Gold is money. Everything else, as J.P. Morgan once put it, is credit — and credit backed by a government running trillion-dollar deficits is credit you should be pricing at a discount.

If you're still holding the view that U.S. Treasurys are the world's safest asset, I urge you to ask yourself what "safe" is supposed to mean when the issuer is borrowing $14 billion a day. These debts will never be repaid — not in real terms, not at these rates, not on this trajectory. They'll be inflated away instead. Plan accordingly.

On July 16, a 34-year-old Tsinghua- and Carnegie Mellon-trained founder named Yang Zhilin launched a language model called Kimi K3. It cost $15 per million output tokens — a fraction of what leading U.S. labs charge for comparable capability. Weeks later, another Chinese lab, DeepSeek, undercut him: its V4-Pro model runs $0.87 per million tokens. Model for model, China is now selling frontier AI at a discount most American labs can't match without losing money.

Here's what that discount actually bought China. During one week in July, Chinese models — Kimi K3, DeepSeek's V3, R1 and V4-Pro, Z.ai's GLM-5.2 — accounted for 57% of all tokens processed by U.S. companies routing traffic through the OpenRouter marketplace. Most American software companies would rather not admit how much of their AI infrastructure now runs on Chinese-built models. But the usage numbers don't lie.

Keep in mind: this isn't the story you were told about the U.S.-China AI race. That story said America controls the advanced chips, therefore America controls the ceiling on Chinese AI. It's true as far as it goes. What that story missed is that China stopped competing on raw capability and started competing on price — and price is what actually decides which model gets called a million times a day inside someone else's product.

The market has already started pricing this in. Z.ai's stock rose over 1,100% in the run-up to Kimi K3's launch, then fell 40% once the new model actually shipped and traders realized the competition had gotten more crowded, not less. That's a market working exactly the way markets are supposed to — violently, and ahead of the headlines.

If you're invested in U.S. AI infrastructure on the assumption that American labs will always command premium pricing, I urge you to revisit that assumption. Compute export controls slow China down. They don't stop Chinese labs from building cheaper models on the chips they already have, and they don't stop the rest of the world from choosing the cheaper option. In other words: the moat everyone assumed existed is a lot narrower than the headlines suggested.

Most Europeans still think of NATO's old 2%-of-GDP defense benchmark as ambitious. It just became the floor, not the ceiling. NATO's new target is 5% of GDP on defense and security by 2035 — and the math behind that number deserves more attention than it's getting: European NATO members could be adding roughly €831 billion a year in security spending within a decade.

Most people will read that headline and assume Europe just solved its dependence on American hard power. Not so fast. The analysts who study these buildouts are blunt about the risk: more money alone does not guarantee stronger capabilities. Europe has a long history of spending on defense without buying interoperability — thirty-plus separate militaries, thirty-plus separate procurement systems, and no consolidated industrial base built to absorb a spending increase of this size without enormous waste.

In other words, €831 billion a year is a number on a spreadsheet until it becomes shared radar systems, common ammunition standards, and defense contractors that can scale across borders instead of just within them.

Here's the opportunity hiding inside the risk: whoever builds the European defense-industrial base that actually absorbs this spending — not the flashiest headline contractor, but the one solving interoperability — captures a decade-long tailwind that most investors are still pricing as a rounding error. I urge you to start building a list now, before the capital allocation decisions get made and the easy money has already moved.

Warren Buffett has spent the better part of the last two years doing something he almost never does: selling more than he buys, and sitting on a cash pile that keeps setting records. Most people treat that as an old man being cautious. I think it's the single most important piece of positioning in the market right now, and this week gave you four separate reasons why he's right to hold it.

Start with the war. Iran and the United States are back to shooting at each other, fourteen months before an election, and the people running the conflict on both sides have told you — in their own words — that they intend to keep going. Brent is at a five-week high. Strait of Hormuz traffic is down to 43% of normal. Add the fiscal picture: Washington borrowed $1.8 trillion in ten months and is on pace to blow past $2 trillion for the year, with interest payments alone now running at a trillion dollars annually. Add the minerals fight: Beijing just blacklisted the two American companies built to reduce U.S. dependence on Chinese rare earths, while criminally prosecuting the people caught moving restricted materials around its export controls. And add the AI race, where Chinese labs are now selling frontier-grade models for a fraction of what U.S. labs charge, taking market share one API call at a time.

None of these four stories made the front page together. They rarely do. But they're the same story, told four different ways: the cost of standing still keeps going up, on every front, at the same time.

That's the Red Queen problem in one line. In Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass, the Red Queen tells Alice that in her country, "it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." That's not a metaphor about effort. It's a description of an environment where standing still means falling behind — where the ground itself is moving under you.

Here's what that means for your money, in three steps.

First, hard assets are no longer a hedge against a single risk — they're a hedge against a system where four unrelated risks are compounding at the same time. Gold at $4,491 isn't pricing the Iran war. It's pricing the Iran war, the debt, the minerals fight, and the AI capex race, simultaneously.

Second, cheap assumptions are the most expensive thing you can own. The assumption that U.S. Treasurys are risk-free, that American AI labs will always command premium pricing, that the Strait of Hormuz stays open, that Beijing's rare earth leverage is a temporary irritant — every one of those assumptions got more expensive to hold this year, and none of them got cheaper.

Third, and this is the one most investors miss: you don't get paid for guessing which of these four risks resolves first. You get paid for owning the assets that hold up regardless of which one does. That's what Buffett's cash pile actually is — not a bet against the market, but a refusal to bet on which crisis wins.

Horse, meet water. I've given you the data. I urge you to act on it before the next headline does the deciding for you.

If shipping through the strait falls below 40% of normal, expect Gulf producers to start rationing exports to allied buyers first — and gasoline prices to move before Brent crude does. Watch tanker insurance rates as your early warning.

If Iran's economy keeps collapsing at its current pace — a rial past 2.2 million to the dollar, inflation near 89% — expect either a decisive Iranian escalation or a rushed, cosmetic ceasefire timed to clear the headlines before Americans vote. Neither outcome is the stable peace markets are currently pricing.

Watch the size of the auctions. If the government shifts more of its borrowing into short-term bills to keep rates palatable, that's the bond market quietly voting on how much longer this deficit path holds together.

If you can get your hands on these companies' capital spending plans for next year, read them closely. Beijing just told the market exactly which two companies it considers the biggest threat to its rare earth leverage — that's as close to a stock tip as an adversary government has ever handed you for free.

If U.S. labs respond to Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4-Pro with matching price cuts rather than capability claims, that's your tell that the price war is real and not just a Chinese marketing exercise. Watch the next round of U.S. model pricing announcements.