On September 5th, an Iranian ballistic missile streaked toward a U.S. aircraft carrier and its escort destroyer in the Gulf of Oman. Both ships evaded every shot. CENTCOM didn't lose a single sailor that day. Within hours, American forces found three Iranian oil tankers and answered back. The Downy was permanently disabled off Kharg Island. The Stark 1 was permanently disabled near Jask. The Kylo went to the bottom of the Gulf of Oman.

That's not an escalation. That's a doctrine. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said it plainly: if Iran shoots at U.S. ships, the United States sinks Iran's tankers — three for every two missiles Tehran fires. Iran's Parliament Speaker, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, answered just as plainly: the era of proportional responses is over. Iran promises responses that are faster, heavier, and more painful.

This is Day 191 of a war most Americans stopped watching months ago. And one more thing — it's now being fought with capital, not just cruise missiles.

Look at the tape. West Texas Intermediate sits at $92.82 a barrel, up more than a dollar just today and up 49% over the past year. Thirteen percent of that gain came in the past month alone, as the Strait of Hormuz corridor turned into a shooting gallery for tankers on both sides. Gold, meanwhile, sits at $4,405 an ounce — down slightly today on a stronger-than-expected September 4th jobs report that has traders pricing in a Federal Reserve rate hike, but still up 21% over the past year and only a modest retreat from January's all-time high above $5,600.

Here's what matters: these two numbers are telling two different stories, and most people are only listening to one of them.

Most people see the oil spike and think "temporary supply scare." I urge you to think again. The U.S. has formalized a policy of destroying Iranian energy infrastructure at sea — not as a one-time strike, but as a standing exchange rate. Standing policies don't unwind in a news cycle. If you're underweight energy because you assume this ends soon, I urge you to reconsider that assumption entirely.

Gold's pullback is the more interesting story. It isn't a rejection of the safe-haven trade — it's a rate story colliding with a war story. The jobs report was hot. Treasury yields jumped to their highest level since January 2025. And Kevin Warsh, sitting in the Fed chair with President Trump publicly pressuring him to cut, now has to decide whether a war in the Gulf and a $92 oil price are inflationary risks he can afford to hike into.

Keep in mind: none of this happens in a vacuum. Every extra dollar of oil-driven inflation makes the government's own debt harder to service, not easier — and Washington is already borrowing at a pace that would have looked reckless two years ago. As Buffett has said for six decades, be fearful when others are greedy. Right now, energy traders are greedy about scarcity, and gold traders are fearful about rates. Both trades can be right at the same time.

If you've been a paid-up subscriber to the idea that gold and energy hedge two different risks, not one — this is the week that proves it.

Plan accordingly.

If you did not claim a stake in SpaceX before the IPO…

Click here now and I’ll give you the name of a new startup that’s now backed by Elon Musk…

And that I believe will be the next hot IPO on Wall Street.

Bloomberg has just confirmed that…

This startup is moving towards “a blockbuster IPO.”

But you do NOT have to wait until the IPO.

Click here now and I’ll show you how to claim your pre-IPO stake for as little as $50.

Look, no other market event creates more overnight wealth…

Than an exciting tech company going public.

For example, early investors who got in at the pre-IPO stage had a chance to turn $1,000 into…

More than $1 million in Facebook when the company went public...

More than $1.6 million in Uber on its IPO day.

And more than $2.3 million in Google the day the company went public.

So click here now because I believe this IPO is imminent.

China told the world its rare-earth war was over. Read the fine print, and it isn't.

Last November, China's commerce ministry — MOFCOM — issued two announcements in quick succession. The first, on November 7th, suspended six export-control directives it had rolled out just weeks earlier. The second, issued two days later, suspended enhanced licensing requirements aimed specifically at American buyers, but only until November 27, 2026. Both governments called it a confidence-building measure, struck after Presidents Trump and Xi sat down together last October. Read that phrase again: confidence-building, not permanent.

Here's what's still standing. Seven medium- and heavy rare-earth elements remain under tight control — samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium, and yttrium. Every one of them shows up in an F-35, a wind turbine, or a laser guidance system. Military end-use restrictions never left the table at all, even while lithium-battery precursors, super-hard industrial materials, gallium, germanium, antimony, and graphite got their temporary reprieve.

In other words, Beijing didn't blink. It paused the clock on the parts of the fight that hurt its own factories and kept the parts that hurt the Pentagon.

If you own miners or processors betting on a permanent thaw, I urge you to mark November 27, 2026 on your calendar. That's when this pause expires — and Beijing has given itself every reason to let it.

Washington set a record last summer, and nobody in the West Wing is bragging about it. Treasury data confirm the U.S. government borrowed $1.8 trillion in the first ten months of fiscal year 2026 alone — more than it borrowed in the entirety of fiscal year 2025. July alone accounted for $432 billion of that, roughly $14 billion a day, every single day.

So why does this matter to you? Because at this pace, the government is on track to add more than $2 trillion in new borrowing this fiscal year, and gross national debt is closing in on $40 trillion — not in some economist's model, but on the calendar in front of us.

First, the deficit doesn't shrink because the calendar changes. Second, the price of that debt is set by a Federal Reserve that just watched two-year Treasury yields jump to their highest level since January 2025 — the same jobs report that rattled gold traders this morning. Third, none of this is hypothetical anymore. A $40 trillion government with a war-driven oil shock on its hands does not have the luxury of choosing only one problem to solve.

If you think Washington closes a $2 trillion deficit through spending discipline, I urge you to look at the last three decades of evidence, not the next three months of promises.

On July 16th, a Chinese lab most Americans had never heard of released a language model, and Nvidia lost roughly $600 billion of market value before the week was out.

Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 launched as what its own makers call the largest open-source model ever released — and independent leaderboards ranked it the best model currently available, ahead of Anthropic's own flagship. The kicker is price. Kimi K3 runs at $15 per million output tokens. DeepSeek's newest model, V4-Pro, runs at $0.87. Compare that to roughly $50 for Anthropic's top model. That's not a rounding error. That's a fifty-fold gap.

Most investors have been trained to think of the AI race as a spending contest — whoever builds the biggest data center wins. Beijing just proved that isn't the whole story. During one week this July, Chinese models accounted for 57% of the tokens American companies ran through the OpenRouter marketplace. That's not a lab experiment. That's American developers voting with their wallets.

And one more thing: the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index dropped 1.6% the day Kimi K3 landed. If cheaper Chinese open-source models keep winning market share on cost, the capital-spending story that has powered chip stocks for three straight years starts to look a lot less certain.

On May 22nd, diplomats from 190 countries filed out of a conference room at the United Nations with nothing to show for four weeks of work. It was the third time in eleven years the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty's review conference had failed to produce an agreement — 2015, 2022, and now 2026. Almost nobody outside the arms-control community noticed.

Here's the idea: the rules-based order that priced risk for the last thirty years is failing in three places at once, and they are not unrelated.

First, the nuclear framework. The NPT conference collapsed after the five recognized nuclear powers diluted no-first-use language, stonewalled on new limits, and deadlocked specifically over Iran — the U.S. insisted on language declaring Iran could never seek a weapon, and Iran refused to sign it. That same fight is now playing out with live ammunition in the Gulf of Oman.

Second, the conventional deterrence framework. A declared U.S. policy of sinking Iranian tankers in exchange for missile fire is not an isolated tactic. It is Washington admitting, out loud, that the old rules of engagement no longer hold.

Third — and this is the one most investors miss — capital is already voting on the outcome. European defense and dual-use startups pulled in €3.5 billion in 2025, nearly double the year before, and defense, security, and resilience now account for 43% of all deep-tech funding on the continent. Quantum Systems, a Munich drone maker, landed a €210 million Bundeswehr contract for 520 systems this year. That's not war-gaming. That's a signed check.

Most people are still pricing the world as if 2015's rules apply. They don't. If you're building a portfolio around the assumption that the treaties and doctrines of the last decade still hold the world together, I urge you to rebuild it around the assumption that they don't.

Keep in mind: none of these three failures reverses on its own. Diplomats don't un-collapse a conference. Navies don't un-declare a doctrine. And capital doesn't flow backward once it commits to a thesis.

Horse, meet water.

China's suspension of its licensing crackdown on rare-earth exports to the U.S. expires this date. If you hold exposure to magnet or defense-metal supply chains, watch whether Beijing lets the pause lapse quietly or turns it into fresh leverage.

Kevin Warsh faces a hot jobs report, a president publicly demanding cuts, and a war-driven oil price near a two-year high. If you're positioned in gold or long-duration Treasuries, expect volatility no matter which way this breaks.

With three tankers destroyed in a single week and a standing U.S. policy to sink more, the number to watch isn't the oil price — it's the war-risk premium shippers now pay to sail the Gulf.

This summer's open-source shock wiped out hundreds of billions in Nvidia's market value in a single week. If you own semiconductor exposure, I urge you to watch every open-source release out of Beijing the way you'd watch a competitor's earnings report.

Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf says proportional responses are over. If you want to know whether that's rhetoric or a real shift in the war's shape, watch for Iranian action outside the Gulf theater — not more of the same.