The USS Abraham Lincoln spent two hundred and fifty days in the Middle East without a single port call. No liberty in Bahrain. No mail call in Dubai. Just steel, salt water, and a war that would not end. When the Navy finally pulled her home last month and swapped in the USS George Washington, the Chief of Naval Operations admitted publicly what every sailor already knew — this deployment is straining the fleet. And now the Pentagon has ordered a third carrier, the USS Theodore Roosevelt, into the same waters.

Three American aircraft carrier strike groups. One regional war. No exit date on the calendar.

I want you to sit with that, because most investors are still trading this market as if the Iran war ended months ago. It didn't. On September 2, American aircraft carried out what President Trump himself called a "very heavy attack" on Iran — the first major clash after a month's lull — and Iranian retaliation reportedly reached targets as far away as Jordan. Trump told the country the strikes wouldn't be prolonged. Markets read that as good news: gold pushed to $4,470 an ounce this morning, Brent crude spiked above $97 a barrel on Strait of Hormuz risk, and traders went back to pricing this as a contained event. But how many more "contained event" mornings can this market shrug off before it stops shrugging?

Here's what they're missing. The United States is now running an open-ended war in the Persian Gulf, funding it with money it doesn't have, at the exact moment the last legal ceiling on nuclear weapons quietly expired. New START — the treaty that has capped American and Russian warheads since 2011 — lapsed back in February. For about two weeks, reports suggested Washington and Moscow had struck a quiet handshake to keep observing the old limits anyway. Then a senior State Department official ended that comfort: "I know of no such agreement," he told reporters. The U.S., he said, no longer considers itself bound by New START's limits at all.

In other words, Washington is fighting a three-carrier war and has let the nuclear rulebook lapse entirely — all while doing it on a stack of new debt nobody plans to repay. The Treasury confirmed a $1.4 trillion deficit for the first nine months of this fiscal year alone, including $120 billion in June by itself, and is on pace to borrow $2 trillion or more before the year is out.

Most people look at that combination — open war, no nuclear ceiling, record borrowing — and see chaos with no trade attached. I see a market that has already told you what to do. Gold is up 24.8% over the past year. Silver, the more volatile, more industrial cousin, is up 60.8% over the same stretch and crossed $66 an ounce this morning. That is not a coincidence. That is capital voting with its feet, the same way it always has when a state stretches its military further than its balance sheet can support.

If you don't already own gold and silver, I urge you to fix that now, while "de-escalation" headlines are giving you a discount. If you already own them, hold — and consider adding on any dip below $4,400. As Buffett says, the stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient. This isn't a trade for the casual reader. It's what every paid-up subscriber to this letter should already have in place before the next headline forces the price higher.

Keep in mind: wars end eventually. Debts, historically, do not get repaid — they get inflated away instead. Plan accordingly.

A new type of AI called "Accelerated AI" is about to take the world by storm…

And stocks connected to it are already breaking out: 133%… 210%… and even 320% or more just in the last few months.

But it's just getting started…

If you want to learn more about "Accelerated AI" — and get name and ticker of the #1 pick to play this opportunity…

Click here for more details. (No purchase necessary.)

China gave the world a rare-earth truce. It also gave it a deadline.

Last November, in the span of two days, China's Commerce Ministry quietly suspended six of its harshest new export directives — the ones threatening to choke off everything from fighter-jet magnets to electric-vehicle motors. The trigger was a sit-down between Presidents Trump and Xi: Washington agreed to delay its own "Affiliates Rule," and Beijing reciprocated by pausing the licensing requirements it had just announced.

Most investors read that as the crisis ending. It didn't end. It got a deadline: November 27, 2026 — less than three months from today — and the underlying framework never went anywhere. China's military end-use restrictions are still in force. The permanent additions of rare-earth elements to the controlled list are still on the books. What got suspended were six specific directives, not the policy itself. Beijing gave the world a window, not a resolution.

And copper isn't covered by any truce at all. It's trading near $6.51 a pound on COMEX, within reach of its own records, and every ounce of it still runs through the same fragile, China-heavy processing chain that the rare-earth pause exposed in the first place.

Nobody in Washington is behaving as though the window matters — there is no visible crash program to stand up non-Chinese processing capacity before the end of November. So what happens on November 28, if nothing changes? The six directives snap back, and the clock resets in China's favor. And one more thing: if you are holding critical-minerals exposure on the assumption this problem is solved, I urge you to reconsider.

Here's the number that should stop you cold: $120 billion. That's what the U.S. Treasury borrowed in June alone — one month, one line item, on top of a debt load that already dwarfs anything in the nation's peacetime history. Add it up over nine months and you get $1.4 trillion, running ahead of last year's already-record pace and on track to blow past $2 trillion for the full fiscal year.

Think about what that means. Most people hear "trillion" so often that it stops registering as a real number. Let me put this in plain English: the government is borrowing money just to keep its existing obligations running, while simultaneously funding a live shooting war in the Persian Gulf and a rearmament race with China. So why does this matter to you, sitting at your kitchen table tonight? Because every dollar of that borrowing eventually competes with your savings for a shrinking pool of real purchasing power.

In short, these debts will never be repaid in dollars worth what they're worth today. They'll be inflated away instead. That's not a prediction — for any empire, at any point in history, it's the only arithmetic that has ever actually worked.

New START expired on February 5, 2026, and for about two weeks, the story was that it barely mattered. Reports circulated of a quiet handshake between Washington and Moscow to keep observing the old warhead limits while both sides negotiated something new.

Twelve days later, a senior State Department official ended that story outright. Assistant Secretary Christopher Yeaw told reporters: "I know of no such agreement." The U.S., he said, no longer considers itself bound by New START's limits — full stop. On-site inspections, for what it's worth, stopped back in 2023 and never resumed.

Read that twice. What exactly stops either side from expanding its arsenal tomorrow? For fifteen years, a single treaty capped how many deployed nuclear warheads the U.S. and Russia could point at each other and let inspectors verify it. Now there is no cap and no verification — and, by Washington's own confirmation, no informal substitute either. The administration says it wants something new eventually; Trump posted that "we should have our Nuclear Experts work on a new, improved, and modernized Treaty" instead of extending the old one. Fine sentiment. No agreement exists yet.

Most investors have never once priced nuclear posture as an investment variable. I urge you to start. Whatever framework eventually replaces New START, Washington wants China's fast-growing arsenal included too — one that was never covered by the old treaty regime to begin with. A world with no verified ceiling on warhead counts is a world where every regional flashpoint, the Persian Gulf included, carries a tail risk it didn't carry two years ago. Defense primes and uranium producers are the direct plays. Gold is the hedge for everyone else.

DeepSeek wants you to believe China just caught up to America. It didn't.

The company released its V4 model in April, claiming it rivals the best closed-source systems from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. Most headlines took the bait. The technical paper tells a different story: independent analysis shows V4 actually trails the U.S. frontier by three to six months, performing roughly on par with American models that are already half a year old.

Keep in mind what happened the last time DeepSeek made headlines — its R1 release briefly tanked U.S. stock markets in early 2025. This time, the market shrugged. Here's what actually matters: Wall Street has learned to price Chinese AI announcements correctly instead of panicking on the first press release. V4 is also severely compute-constrained — DeepSeek can't even serve the model to most of its own customers yet.

None of that means the race is over. China is still closing the gap using smuggled American chip technology and data-extraction attacks against U.S. AI systems. Does seven months of lead sound like a lot to you? It's real — but it isn't growing. It's holding steady. And a gap that stops widening is a gap that eventually closes.

When New START expired in February, the first reports said Washington and Moscow had struck a quiet handshake to keep observing the old limits anyway. Twelve days later, a senior State Department official killed that story outright. "I know of no such agreement," he told reporters. Full stop.

Here's the idea: for eighty years, the nuclear order rested on treaties, not trust. Treaties survive administrations. Treaties survive bad blood. Handshakes don't — and this year, it turns out there wasn't even a handshake to survive. And the vanishing nuclear ceiling isn't the only rulebook being quietly rewritten in 2026. China's rare-earth truce is a suspension with a November expiration date, not a settlement. The three-carrier deployment in the Persian Gulf is an open-ended commitment with no legal mandate governing when it ends. Even Europe's own defense establishment has stopped assuming Washington's security guarantee is unconditional — a plan called "Sparta 2.0," backed by a group of German industrialists and economists, would direct roughly $59 billion a year for the next decade toward closing capability gaps in air defense, drones, and deep strike, precisely so Europe doesn't have to keep depending on someone else's promise.

First: the postwar security architecture — nuclear treaties, extended deterrence, alliance guarantees — is being replaced everywhere at once, not by new treaties, but by informal arrangements any single leader can walk away from without consequence.

Second: markets have already started pricing this. Precious metals are near records on safe-haven demand alone. European governments are quietly planning to spend tens of billions a year on their own deterrent rather than lean on a Washington guarantee.

Third: the countries and companies moving fastest to build independent capability — in minerals, in defense manufacturing, in AI compute — will hold the leverage when the next handshake breaks. The ones still assuming the old guarantees hold will be the ones caught flat-footed.

Most people are still investing as if the old rulebook is still in force. It isn't. What happens to a system built on promises when the promises themselves stop being kept? I urge you to position for a world of handshakes that don't hold, not treaties that do — hard assets you hold directly, exposure to the nations and companies building independent capability, and as little faith as possible in any guarantee that isn't backed by law. Horse, meet water.

The suspended export directives snap back into force unless Washington and Beijing strike a new deal before this date. If you hold exposure to defense, EV, or electronics supply chains, mark this date now — the market won't wait until the last week of November to react.

There is officially no limit on U.S. or Russian deployed nuclear warheads for the first time in over three decades, and no negotiation has produced even an informal substitute. If you want an early read on how seriously either government treats that vacuum, watch for the first real negotiating session — not another press statement.

With three U.S. carrier strike groups now committed to the Gulf and Iran actively contesting the strait, tanker insurance costs and freight rates are the fastest-moving indicator of how hot this war is actually running. If you trade energy, watch the tanker market before you watch the headlines.

German and European officials are debating whether to commit roughly $59 billion a year for the next decade to independent defense capability. A formal commitment would be the clearest tell yet that Europe no longer assumes an unconditional American security guarantee.

Gold sits just below this psychological level as of this morning. If you are waiting for a "better entry point" before buying, I urge you to ask yourself how many all-time highs you've already watched pass by while waiting for one.