On February 28 of this year, a war-risk underwriter in London quoted a shipowner a premium forty times the normal rate to carry a single tanker through the Strait of Hormuz — and that was that. The strait didn't close by mine or blockade. It closed by arithmetic, the moment insuring the trip cost more than the cargo was worth. Six months later, on June 17, Washington and Tehran signed a memorandum promising sixty days of quiet while they negotiated something permanent. I want you to notice the date on that memorandum. It expired on August 17. Three days ago. When the deadline came, Donald Trump didn't extend it. He threatened Oman instead. And the market did what markets do the moment a president stops pretending a ceasefire means peace: it priced in war.

WTI crude jumped 2.78% in a single session to $86.74 a barrel, up more than 36% from a year ago. Tanker owners willing to run the Gulf this week could earn more than $520,000 a day chartering a supertanker from the Middle East to China — a rate that would have sounded like a typo eighteen months ago. Transits through the strait fell to 73 in the week of August 10, down from 91 the week before. Abu Dhabi's national oil company didn't wait for the market to sort itself out. It bought six supertankers and five gas carriers outright, $1.3 billion, cash — because owning the ship beats renting one when nobody will insure the cargo. And one more thing: a bulker was struck this week and a seafarer was killed, with unconfirmed reports of an Emirati tanker seized near Qeshm Island.

Tehran wasn't sitting still either. Iran's acting defense minister says missile production "had not stopped for a single day" during the ceasefire. The Revolutionary Guard's spokesman claims drone output tripled, with better accuracy from combat testing during the war. American assessments from June already put Iran's surviving missile stockpile at roughly 70% of pre-war levels, its drone arsenal at 40%. Most people assumed a ceasefire meant both sides stood down. They didn't. They rearmed.

If you've been a paid-up subscriber of mine for any length of time, you already know I don't trade on hope. Here's what matters to your money: a ceasefire both sides use to rebuild for the next round isn't peace. It's a reload. And the market has already made its call on how this ends. Gold sits at $4,494 an ounce, up more than 34% this year, having surged over 4% in a single session last week before easing back. Silver is at $66.06, up 73% year-to-date. Those are not the numbers of a market that believes a handshake signed in June. Those are the numbers of a market buying insurance nobody in Washington can talk it out of. If you don't already own gold and silver, I urge you to fix that now — not because I think Hormuz reopens tomorrow, but because I think it doesn't, and the world is only beginning to price that in.

Keep in mind: the last time a chokepoint carrying a fifth of the world's oil sat effectively closed for six months, nobody in government had a plan for it either. Plan accordingly.

If you did not claim a stake in SpaceX before the IPO…

Click here now and I’ll give you the name of a new startup that’s now backed by Elon Musk…

And that I believe will be the next hot IPO on Wall Street.

Bloomberg has just confirmed that…

This startup is moving towards “a blockbuster IPO.”

But you do NOT have to wait until the IPO.

Click here now and I’ll show you how to claim your pre-IPO stake for as little as $50.

Look, no other market event creates more overnight wealth…

Than an exciting tech company going public.

For example, early investors who got in at the pre-IPO stage had a chance to turn $1,000 into…

More than $1 million in Facebook when the company went public...

More than $1.6 million in Uber on its IPO day.

And more than $2.3 million in Google the day the company went public.

So click here now because I believe this IPO is imminent.

Bloom Energy buys more scandium than any company on earth, and it still can't buy enough. Scandium is element 21, a silvery-white metal that turns ordinary aircraft-grade aluminum into something dramatically stronger, lighter, and far more resistant to heat — the alloy that goes into fighter jets, hypersonic vehicles, and the fuel cells Bloom sells to keep data centers running. Here's the problem: the entire world produces about 80 tonnes of the stuff a year. Copper, by comparison, runs 22 million tonnes annually. Think about that gap for a second.

Scandium isn't scarce because it's rare in the ground. It's scarce because almost nobody digs for it on purpose — it comes out as a byproduct of titanium processing, old uranium tailings, and nickel refining, and China controls somewhere between 80% and 90% of the global supply. Beijing put a license requirement on scandium exports back in April of last year, and — despite the broader trade truce with Washington — that particular restriction has never been lifted. The Shanghai benchmark price hit $3,333 a kilogram in early August, down from July's $3,748 but still miles above anything seen before the restrictions began. A single large contract can move the spot price 30% in a quarter. That's not a market. That's a chokehold with a price tag.

Rio Tinto is trying to break it, expanding its Quebec scandium oxide plant from 4 tonnes a year to 9. ElementUS Minerals picked up a $29.9 million Pentagon award in November to build domestic supply. It won't be enough — demand is projected to hit 117 tonnes by next year, more than current global production, full stop. And one more thing: this is the same playbook China has run on dysprosium, terbium, and yttrium, where export volumes are still down roughly 50% from pre-restriction levels and some of those prices have risen more than a hundredfold. In other words, scandium isn't an isolated squeeze. It's the same knife China has held to the throat of advanced manufacturing since April of last year, just a smaller, sharper version of it. If you're invested anywhere near defense, aerospace, or advanced materials, I urge you to find out how exposed your holdings are to a metal measured in tonnes, not millions of tonnes.

The USS Nimitz is dying, slowly, on purpose. The Navy announced this month that the fifty-year-old carrier will stay in service through 2027 — not because the ship is thriving, but because its replacement isn't ready. Huntington Ingalls received a $95.7 million contract in March just to plan how to defuel and retire the vessel, with that prep work not finishing until March 2027. Meanwhile the USS John F. Kennedy, the carrier meant to take Nimitz's place, is still running final trials at Newport News. This is what it looks like when a superpower's shipbuilding falls behind its own war plans: keep the old ship running on life support and hope nothing happens in the gap.

So why does this matter to you? Because the same government that can't build a carrier on schedule is also the government asking you to trust it with your Treasury bonds. The Treasury confirmed the country borrowed $1.8 trillion in just the first ten months of this fiscal year — more than it borrowed in the entirety of fiscal year 2025. July alone added $432 billion to the pile, roughly $14 billion a day, every day, for a month. Budget watchers now project the full-year deficit clears $2 trillion. National debt is closing in on $40 trillion.

Most investors treat a slow carrier refit and a ballooning deficit as two separate stories. They aren't. Both are symptoms of the same disease: a government promising more than it can deliver on the timeline it promised. Every one of those borrowed dollars carries an interest bill, and that bill compounds whether or not the carrier arrives on schedule. In short, Washington is stretched — militarily and fiscally — at exactly the moment the world needs it to look strong. Gold at $4,494 an ounce isn't a coincidence. It's a verdict.

China just proved that in artificial intelligence, free beats best. On August 3, Alibaba released one of the largest AI models ever built — 2.4 trillion parameters — and then handed the underlying files to anyone who wanted them on Hugging Face a week later, for free. Days earlier, DeepSeek released its own frontier-sized model and priced access to it at a fraction of a cent per thousand words, cheap enough that running it costs almost nothing next to the American alternatives. Let me put this in plain English: two of America's best-funded AI labs spend billions building models they then charge you to use. China's labs are building comparable models and giving large pieces of them away.

Anthropic's own chief executive, Dario Amodei, has warned publicly against using open models built in China or distilled from proprietary Western ones. Keep in mind who's saying that and why — the company whose business model depends on you not having a free alternative is the one telling you the free alternative is dangerous. Hugging Face's chief executive, Clément Delangue, was more direct on CNBC this month: China is "clearly dominating on open models right now," and he "wouldn't be surprised" if it dominates at the frontier too, by the end of this year or next.

Most people still treat this as an American technology story. It's a capital efficiency story. If you can get 90% of the performance for a fraction of the price — or for free — the moat around America's most expensive AI labs gets shallower every quarter. And one more thing: this is happening at the exact moment US markets are pricing AI infrastructure spending as a forever-growth story. I urge you to ask what happens to that valuation the day free becomes good enough.

Five of Germany's most prominent economic minds — a former Airbus chief executive, a venture capitalist, the president of the Kiel Institute, Airbus's current chairman, and a former defense staffer — put a number this year on something Europe has talked about for a decade without ever pricing: what does it actually cost to stop depending on America for defense? Their answer: about €50 billion, or $59 billion, a year, for the next ten years. That's roughly 10% of what Europe already spends on defense, and about a quarter of one percent of GDP annually. Not an abstraction. A budget line.

Here's the idea. The full transition needs €150 to 200 billion by 2030 and roughly €500 billion over the decade — capital that has to come from somewhere, and increasingly it's coming from European money that used to flow toward American assets by default. The authors say substantial progress is realistic within three to five years, full autonomy within five to ten, if European governments treat it as a political priority rather than an aspiration. Most people still assume Europe talks about strategic autonomy and never funds it. This time, five of the continent's most credible economic voices put a number on the table instead of a slogan.

In other words, Europe just told you what independence from Washington is worth in hard currency. If you're allocating capital and still treating European defense and industrial names as a regional afterthought, I urge you to reconsider. A $59-billion-a-year commitment doesn't stay a research paper for long. It shows up in budgets first, and in your portfolio after that. Keep in mind where that capital was headed before this decade's rearmament began: much of it used to cross the Atlantic and buy American assets by default. Every euro that instead builds a European defense industrial base is a euro Washington can no longer assume will show up to fund its own deficit.

In eight days, Kevin Warsh will walk to a podium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and deliver the first keynote address of his career as Chairman of the Federal Reserve. Twenty minutes — that's roughly how long traders expect his remarks to run, and every clause of it will get parsed by a market sitting near record highs. Right after his first policy meeting in July, the odds of a September rate hike stood near 58%. Today they sit around one in three. Inflation is running in the mid-3% range. The labor market is weakening. And the man who has to reconcile those two facts in front of the entire world hasn't given a single public speech as chair yet.

Here's the framework I use for moments like this. First: when a central bank can't tell you clearly whether it's fighting inflation or propping up a weakening job market, that's not indecision — that's a tell the two goals have become incompatible. Second: when a government is borrowing $1.8 trillion in ten months while a central bank tries to hold a credible line on prices, the bond market and the currency absorb the contradiction, not the government. Third: when investors can't trust a ceasefire to hold or a Fed chair's first speech to clarify anything, they stop asking institutions to tell the truth and start asking the market to price it instead.

That's exactly what's happening. The 10-year Treasury yield sits at 4.71%, up nearly forty basis points over the past year despite all the talk of a slowing economy. Gold has surged 34% year-to-date. Silver is up 73%. Copper touched an all-time high of $6.83 a pound earlier this month before easing back. None of these assets move like this when investors believe the people in charge have a handle on things.

That line opened this issue for a reason. Nobody in Washington, Beijing, or Tehran is going to stand up and admit the ceasefire is a pause for rearmament, that the deficit is unrepayable, or that a Fed chair's silence is itself a kind of answer. The market doesn't need them to. As Buffett has said, be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful — and right now, hard assets are telling you plainly what the fearful already know. Most investors are still waiting for an official admission that isn't coming. I urge you to stop waiting. Horse, meet water.

Kevin Warsh delivers his first Jackson Hole speech as Fed chair on August 28, and the September rate decision follows nineteen days later. If you're holding rate-sensitive positions, watch that speech closely — first keynotes get parsed harder than routine ones, because the market is still building a dictionary for what this chairman's words actually mean.

Beijing's suspension of its harshest rare-earth licensing rules runs out on November 27. If you own anything downstream of magnets, defense electronics, or EV motors, plan for the possibility that this truce simply isn't renewed.

Trump has threatened Oman directly, and the ceasefire framework that held for five months just lapsed. If tanker rates keep climbing past where they sit today, that's your confirmation the market believes this gets worse before it gets better.

The USS Nimitz's retirement prep must finish by March 2027, the same window the USS John F. Kennedy is supposed to enter service. If that timeline slips even slightly, the Navy runs a real gap in Indo-Pacific carrier coverage — and Washington will talk tough about China while quietly hoping nothing happens in that gap.

Alibaba and DeepSeek have both released frontier-scale models at a fraction of Western pricing this month alone. If you hold AI infrastructure names priced for endless pricing power, watch for the next open-weight release out of China — it's arriving faster than most portfolios are prepared for.