On Saturday, while American bombs were falling on Iranian coastal batteries for the third time in a week, a quiet meeting took place in Muscat. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sat across from his Omani counterpart, Sayyid Badr Albusaidi, and they discussed something that hasn't been seriously proposed since the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: splitting the Strait of Hormuz into two separately controlled corridors.

Here's the idea. The southern corridor — through Omani territorial waters — would allow free navigation under prewar conditions. No permissions. No tolls. Ships hug the Omani coastline, protected by U.S. naval forces. The northern corridor — through Iranian territorial waters — would require prior authorization from Tehran. No tolls would be imposed, but passage would be conditional on Iranian approval.

If you think this sounds like a partition of the world's most important energy chokepoint, you're right. Because that's exactly what it is.

Before February 28th, when the U.S. and Israel launched airstrikes on Iran and the strait effectively closed, roughly 15 million barrels of oil and 20% of the world's liquefied natural gas passed through Hormuz every day. Under the old maritime order, ships transited a recognized traffic separation scheme — northbound and southbound lanes — without requesting permission from anyone. That order is gone. Iran has declared the strait closed twice in the past week. The IRGC has fired on commercial vessels using what it calls "unauthorized routes." The U.S. military has responded by defending an alternative southern passage along the Omani coast. Two navies. Two routes. Two competing claims of sovereignty over the same narrow body of water.

So why does this matter to you?

Because the Oman proposal isn't just a ceasefire mechanism — it's the blueprint for a permanent restructuring of global energy logistics. If the dual-corridor system becomes the status quo, every barrel of oil, every LNG tanker, and every container ship transiting the Persian Gulf will face a binary choice: go through Omani waters under U.S. protection, or go through Iranian waters under Tehran's rules. Insurance premiums will diverge. Shipping routes will split. Pricing models will change. And the 25% of the world's seaborne oil that used to flow through a single uncontested channel will now flow through a contested one — permanently.

The weekend told you everything about the trajectory. On Saturday night, U.S. Central Command struck roughly 140 Iranian military targets — drone sites, missile storage, naval capabilities, radar, communications. It was the third round of strikes in a week. Iran retaliated by hitting U.S. military bases in five countries — Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan, Oman, and Qatar. Sirens sounded in Bahrain for the third time. The IRGC declared Hormuz closed. The U.S. declared it open. Tracking data showed traffic had fallen to a trickle by Sunday.

Brent crude opened Monday morning at $78.14 — up nearly 9% from a week ago. WTI hit $73.87. One analyst told CNBC it was "quite plausible" for Brent to retest $100. RBC Capital Markets said normalization is "nowhere close." U.S. gasoline prices held at $3.88 a gallon — more than 70 cents higher than a year ago. Moody's economist Mark Zandi estimated the Iran war has already cost American households $1,000 each — and that's a conservative figure.

Gold steadied above $4,100, finishing the most volatile week of the year roughly flat. That's the tell. Gold isn't panicking because the geopolitical bid and the rate-hike fear are canceling each other out. If the Fed hikes in September while oil is at $80 and the strait is contested, gold breaks higher. If the war escalates further, gold breaks higher. The floor is rising even when the price looks stuck.

If you don't own energy, gold, and defense exposure at this point, I urge you to ask yourself what you're waiting for. The old maritime order died this week. A new one is being born in Muscat. And the market hasn't priced it in yet.

Elon Musk called lithium refining a “license to print money.”

He is right. Here is why.

Global lithium demand is set to grow 5X by 2040. Every EV battery needs up to 60 kilograms of it. AI data centers runs on it. And the old supply chain cannot keep up.

That is why General Motors led a $50 million round into a private company called EnergyX.

What GM saw was simple. The old way of mining lithium takes 18 months and leaves most of the metal in the dirt. EnergyX built a patented system that pulls out 3X more, and it does it in days.

That’s why GM wrote the check.

And now you can invest alongside with them, until July 16.

The mechanics of the Oman proposal deserve your full attention. Under the draft, the southern corridor through Omani waters would operate under prewar conditions — free transit, no authorization required. The U.S. Navy's Joint Maritime Information Center has already confirmed this route is operational, describing the "southern route" hugging the Omani coastline as "open for two-way traffic."

The northern corridor through Iranian waters would require ships to request Tehran's permission. Iran's strait authority backed up the IRGC's closure announcement on Sunday, stating that passage is "not possible" and that permits would be reviewed once "stability and calm are restored."

In other words, there are now two competing navigation systems operating simultaneously in the same strait. Trump told CNN over the weekend: "It's open as far as we're concerned." Iran's chief negotiator posted on X: "The Strait of Hormuz will only remain open under Iranian arrangements."

Keep in mind: no corridor is truly open until shipping companies and their insurers deem it safe. War-risk insurance premiums have surged from 0.125% to between 0.2% and 0.4% of vessel value per transit. For a supertanker, that's a quarter-million-dollar increase per crossing. The insurance market — not the military — will decide which corridor carries traffic. And right now, the insurance market is pricing in chaos.

Iran's retaliation on Saturday expanded the geography of the conflict to a degree that most investors haven't absorbed. The IRGC struck U.S. military facilities in Kuwait, Bahrain, Jordan, Oman, and Qatar — five sovereign nations, all American allies, all hosting U.S. forces under bilateral defense agreements. Sirens sounded in Bahrain. Kuwait said it was dealing with "hostile aerial targets." Jordan's military intercepted four missiles within its airspace.

This is no longer a bilateral war between Washington and Tehran. It is a regional conflict that now touches the security infrastructure of every Gulf Cooperation Council member state plus Jordan. The UN Secretary-General warned of "catastrophic consequences" if escalation continues. Gulf states and Pakistan issued a joint condemnation.

And one more thing... an intelligence report surfaced this week that Iran was considering a new assassination plot against President Trump, citing Israeli intelligence shared with Washington. Trump confirmed he was "on every list." The IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency published a purported statement from the new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei — who has not appeared publicly since his father was killed — declaring that "revenge is the demand of our nation and must certainly be carried out."

Most people think escalation has a ceiling. In this conflict, the ceiling keeps rising.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's, told Fortune this week that the Iran war has already cost the average American household roughly $1,000 — and he called that estimate conservative. The mechanism is straightforward: higher oil prices flow into gasoline, jet fuel, shipping costs, and input prices across every sector of the economy. European benchmark gas prices rose 61% between August 2025 and March 2026. Asian LNG prices jumped more than 80%. Three-quarters of LNG shipments through Hormuz are bound for Asia.

The IMF's central forecast still assumes a "relatively short conflict and a gradual restoration of production and transport." That assumption is crumbling in real time. This week alone, the U.S. hit 140 targets, Iran hit five countries, and traffic in the strait fell to a trickle. If you're still using pre-war economic assumptions in your investment models, you're solving last year's problem.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared in public since his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed by U.S.-Israeli airstrikes on February 28th. He was buried in Mashhad on July 10th — four and a half months after his death. And this weekend, a statement attributed to the new Supreme Leader was released by Iranian media declaring that "revenge is the demand of our nation and must certainly be carried out."

Here's what you need to understand. Iran's political system concentrates ultimate authority in the Supreme Leader — over the military, the judiciary, the nuclear program, and foreign policy. The transition from father to son was managed by the Assembly of Experts, but Mojtaba's authority is untested. The IRGC — which reports directly to the Supreme Leader — has been operating with increasing autonomy since February. The attacks on commercial vessels in Hormuz, the retaliatory strikes on five countries, the declaration of strait closure — these are IRGC operations, not presidential ones. President Pezeshkian, the reformist, is being sidelined.

Let me put this in plain English. The IRGC is filling the power vacuum left by Khamenei's death. And the IRGC's strategic doctrine is built on one idea: Hormuz is Iranian sovereign territory, and control over it is non-negotiable. Every commercial vessel attack, every strait closure, every retaliatory strike on Gulf bases is a message — not to Trump, but to Pezeshkian and the reformists inside Iran: we control the leverage, and you do not.

This is the sovereignty trap. Iran cannot accept the Omani dual-corridor proposal without conceding that Hormuz is shared space. And the IRGC cannot concede shared space without losing the single most powerful piece of leverage Tehran has against the West. The result is a conflict that neither side can resolve through military strikes alone — because the fundamental dispute isn't about shipping lanes. It's about who governs the chokepoint.

So what should you do? First, accept that this conflict has no clean resolution on any foreseeable timeline. The 60-day MOU window closes in mid-August. There is no deal on the table. Position your portfolio for prolonged disruption — not a temporary spike. Second, own the beneficiaries: upstream energy producers, midstream operators, defense contractors supplying precision munitions, and the Gulf logistics companies rerouting traffic around the southern corridor. Third, watch Russia. Moscow is reportedly cutting Su-35 deliveries to its own air force to fulfill Iranian orders. That tells you everything about where Russia sees this conflict going — and it's not toward peace.

Horse, meet water.

Three days from now, the wind-down period on the revoked Iranian oil sanctions waiver expires. After Thursday, any entity handling Iranian crude faces full U.S. secondary sanctions. Asian refiners — particularly in China and India — must decide this week whether to keep buying. If they stop, global supply tightens further. If they don't, the sanctions regime faces its first major

Oil up 9% in a week. Brent flirting with $80. The Fed meets in two weeks with inflation running hot and a shooting war in the Gulf. Markets put July hike odds at 25%, but September remains at 63%. Every headline between now and then moves the needle.

Iran's new Supreme Leader has not appeared publicly in four and a half months. The IRGC is operating with growing autonomy. If Mojtaba Khamenei makes his first public appearance, the content of his remarks will set the tone for Iranian strategy — either escalation or negotiation. His silence is itself a message.

The Muscat proposal is the only diplomatic framework on the table. If Iran accepts a southern corridor under Omani control, it surrenders leverage. If it refuses, strikes continue and oil keeps climbing. Watch whether the insurance market begins quoting separate premiums for each corridor — that will tell you the market believes the partition is real.

Russia is reportedly diverting fighter jet production from its own military to fulfill Iranian orders. This deepens the Moscow-Tehran defense axis and signals that Russia sees Iran's military capacity as a long-term strategic investment — not a war it expects to end soon.